PREQIVO

You lose tenders
before the writing starts.


Know what it takes to win before you start writing.

Run a tender through Preqivo See the benchmark

Bid intelligence for serious bid teams

01 / The current state

Your bid team is deciding before it has the full picture.


The process is manual. The stakes are not.

Waitaki District Council, Contract 931

The pack alone: 94 pages, two contracts, and three documents that are referenced but never supplied.


94 Pages
2 Contracts
3 Referenced,
never supplied

02 / The problem

Page 78 of 94 in the released bundle

Miss this and the rest of the bid may not matter.


Great writing cannot rescue a misunderstood tender.

Waitaki District Council, Contract 931. Pavement rehabilitation. Publicly released bundle.

Minimum standard, inside a scored criterion

The requirement sits two thirds of the way down page 78, inside a scored criterion and not in the pre-conditions table. A response that is strong on pavement and silent on culverts is excluded before it is scored.

Relevant Experience: evidence of satisfactory rural stormwater channel and culvert installation works completed in the last three years. Failure of an explicit minimum conformance standard excludes the proposal from further consideration.

Contract 931 RFP · Section 3.3 · Page 78 of 94 · Gate C931-G4

03 / The category

Preqivo is the Bid Intelligence layer.

Tender portalsFind the opportunity
PreqivoUnderstand the opportunity Bid intelligence
Bid managementManage the response
AI writersCreate the content

Understand first. Respond second.

04 / The product

Give Preqivo the documents.
Get back the bid picture.

Tender packPreqivo Bid picture
Requirements

Every obligation, extracted and separated

Evaluation

What is scored, and how it is weighted

Compliance

Mandatory gates and minimum standards

Risks

What the contract puts on you

Evidence gaps

What you cannot yet prove

Response plan

What to write, and in what order

05 / The proof

Tested on real tenders.


It does not just summarise the tender. It interrogates it.

5Real tender packs
429Structured items surfaced
87Mandatory gates
45Risks and gaps

Scored against 189 obligations derived independently from the five source documents, each carrying page, section and a verbatim quote.

Mandatory gates found 70 of 72
Minimum conformance standards 37 of 37
Fabricated requirements, any run None

Core 5 independent benchmark audit · 2 September 2026

Mandatory gate C931-G4

Relevant Experience: evidence of satisfactory rural stormwater channel and culvert installation works completed in the last three years.

Contract 931 RFP · Section 3.3 · Page 78 of 94

Every item Preqivo returns carries the document, the page, the section and the words themselves. If it cannot cite it, it does not assert it.

06 / The difference

AI bid writers

Write faster.

Before you generate more words, make sure you are answering the right question.

Preqivo

Know what to write.

Understand the tender completely, then let the writing tools do their job.

07 / The economics

A major bid is already an investment.


The expensive part is not analysing the tender properly. It is getting it wrong.

500 hours×$150 per hour=
$75,000

Bid investment


For the chance to win a $5m, $20m or $100m contract.

Illustrative scenario. Not a measured customer average.

08 / The invitation

Challenge Preqivo.

Give us a tender your team already knows. Compare what your process found with what Preqivo finds.

Your tenderYour teamYour risks

No generic demo. No carefully prepared sample tender.

Run a tender through Preqivo Ask a question

info@preqivo.com